
Anyway, the letter outlined James Dumas' fantasy of Aniko's innocence and victimization, a position that several State and Federal court judges weren't buying in spite of Dumas' animated exhibitions of evidence-less conjecture. Mr. Dumas, whose known for entertaining and unfounded outbursts, could not convince any judge that my litigation, "Was the most overblown case I have ever seen in all my years of practicing law." Aniko's own testimony was all the evidence needed to prove my allegations. During the course of the execution of this and other litigations, the woman has rarely opened her mouth to say the same thing twice.
In my response letter to Mr. Tyson, I made it clear that not only was this website truthful, accurate and completely defensible, but that it was critical to the public good. The public needs to be aware of Aniko's antics until she can be stopped and forced to pay her mounting debt to society. In the meantime Mr. Tyson, bring it on. Although I don't think Ms. Kaye can afford to pay you. You see, she owes me and my fellow litigants another $1.1 million.