Cue the Sobbing Violins!

Continuing our journey from the sublime to the ridiculous, we reach Deutsche Bank's upcoming Motion for Relief of the Automatic Stay (in this case of the foreclosure of Aniko's property on Benedict Canyon Road.) as imposed by the bankruptcy filing. What Aniko (and her attorneys Abbott and Costello) are trying to do through their opposition, is keep the bank from foreclosing on the house on which Aniko has not paid her mortgage for over a year. Aniko swears in her attached declaration that the tenants have not paid their rent but that contradicts her sworn testimony given at the January 11, 2001 meeting of creditors. At that time, Aniko explained that the $5,000 she lent to Realtor Jan Caswell-Pastras came from rents she collected at the very same Benedict Canyon house. Hmmm. Aniko, how many times have I told you that a good liar has to have a good memory? And how is it possible that your esteemed attorneys fail to prevent (or do they fail to notice?) these conflicting testimonies that you give? Hmmm.

As well as blaming Deutsche Bank (which inherited the mortgage from Washington Mutual) for her current mess, she blames the recession and a "perfect storm of financial calamity" which (in summary of all the gobbledygook offered by Attorney Bryan Tyson) should absolve Aniko of any responsibility for her mess and justifies the arrears.

"She has been the defendant in a particularly vindictive lawsuit, and even though that suit has been settled at great cost to her, the vindictiveness has spilled over onto the Internet, where she continues to be the target of juvenile, but none the less appalling, efforts at character assassination."

Of course what Mr. Tyson is referring to here is this blog. Let me help you here Bryan. She was a defendant because she did unspeakable things as a slumlord, and she settled it, not out of the need to be free of the lawsuit, but because she was about to lose big and be found accountable for perjury at the same time. This blog is not juvenile, but factual and serves as a warning to future targets of her schemes, lies and deceit. Nor does this blog serve as an attempt at character assassination. Her character is self-assassinating through her campaign of slumlord activities, fraud, perjury, tax evasion, lies, deceit and her abuse of others for her self-gain.

The opposition goes on to infer that,as usual, nothing is Aniko's fault and the additional litigation she is now facing, as well as the pending IRS audit (Aniko apparently owes Uncle Sam several hundreds of thousands of dollars) are all part of a grand conspiracy to destroy her life.

My favorite line of the opposition is, "The foregoing is not intended to cue the sobbing violins...". Don't be ridiculous Bryan, of course it is. The entire opposition smacks of desperation and an attempt to avoid accountability. You've tried this tactic on several other motions in front of this and other courts before and you know that your attempts are fruitless. The Judge has got to be laughing every time you pull this "victim" crap as you are fooling nobody. So why bother throwing darts at the board? Well if the bankruptcy estate is going to be liquidated, then the debtor's attorneys might as well try and get as big a piece of the pie as possible. Right boys?

That's the Way the Mercedes Benz

Another fun day of listening to the fantasy world of Aniko Kaye, this time in a January 11, 2011 meeting of the creditors with respect to her bankruptcy filing. Aniko was in her usual form, displaying selective memory and claiming ailments and offering all kinds of excuses for her questionable performance which I’m sure she’ll also invoke to explain about her conflicting testimony.

She must be scratching her ass though, as she tries to figure out how we found about her new old identity, “Aniko Devenyi”. She procured new identification so that she could open her Wells Fargo and hide money from the US Trustee. She claimed to have a couple of hundred dollars in it but what she doesn’t know, until she reads this, is that we know she deposited $50,000 into the account. Keep scratching Aniko. She also must have been shocked to find out that we knew about her loan to real estate agent, and Ethel Mertz to her Lucy, Jan Caswell-Pastras. Like Ethel, Jan can be counted on to fall into another scheme no matter how many messes Lucy has to “splain”. Aniko explained the loan was necessary to help Jan pay rent. Rent? Really? Who pays rent on their own condo? Jan who just won’t learn a lesson, will obviously keep playing along with Aniko’s schemes until she is also dragged into the abyss.

But today’s pièce de résistance was Aniko trying to explain how she suddenly lost ownership of her beloved 2005 Mercedes Benz CL 600. Anybody who knows Aniko, knows that she loves that car. Apparently she’ll do anything to keep that car including commit perjury (nothing new for this habitual liar), and risk going to jail for bankruptcy fraud. The Trustee was trying to locate the Mercedes, as it is an asset of the bankruptcy estate, and Aniko claimed she doesn't know where it is and that she doesn't own it. When asked who does own it, she offered up her friend, Eric Guefen. When asked about the fact that she had it in the garage at the Roxbury building recently, she claimed she had borrowed it. When asked if she borrowed it from Eric, she said she borrowed it from his mother, Karel Guefen. When asked where the vehicle was when she borrowed it, she claimed it was being kept at Karel's house on North Maple St. in Beverly Hills, but that Karel has now moved and Aniko doesn't know where she moved or where the car is now. She repeated that she sold it to Eric Guefen back in 2008 and gave him the title papers and doesn't know why he didn't register the car in his name. She also confirmed that when she filed for bankruptcy, the car was being kept at Eric Guefen's house, but did not know the address other than it was in the City of Los Angeles. In other words, she didn’t want us to know where the car is parked.

In the meantime, Guefen’s attorney, Peter Weinberger, has called Aniko’s story “nonsense”, and has informed all concerned that his client does not have the vehicle, claims no ownership to the vehicle, and that he only held an unsigned pink slip as collateral. Apparently, Mr. Guefen would like to surrender the pink slip and “wash his hands of everything to do with Aniko”. He has made the pink slip available to the Bankruptcy Trustee.

This woman will never learn. When asked where she currently works, she refused to answer. Her attorney James Dumas, the sociopath’s best friend, chimed in that if she were to reveal her workplace, I would immediately post it on this blog, “which has been very injurious to Aniko”. Get this through your head Dumass; it is not the website that is injurious to Aniko. Aniko is her own worst enemy. Teach her to tell the truth. Then maybe you’ll finally be doing something useful and she’ll stop making you look like an idiot.

In the meantime, I've instructed Counsel to prepare a claim of bankruptcy fraud to the Criminal Enforcement Unit of the Executive Office for U.S. Trustees if Aniko does not deliver the car, intact, to John Pringle, the bankruptcy trustee, by February 18, 2011.

Attorney James Dumas Takes Junior on a Trip to Fantasyland

Looks like Aniko is a little worried about her reputation becoming public knowledge. And it also looks like attorney James Dumas is concerned about the quality of his client list. Recently, I received a Cease and Desist Demand letter from Dumas & Associates associate, Bryan Tyson, who seems to have joined Dumass on his trip to Fantasyland. Mr. Tyson threatened me with litigation if I continue to publish this website. Apparently Mr. Tyson needs to learn that before one toes the company line, one should be sure that the line is not fraught with landmines. My suggestion Mr. Tyson: "Run Forrest! Run!", before you too are tainted by this loser of a client.

Anyway, the letter outlined James Dumas' fantasy of Aniko's innocence and victimization, a position that several State and Federal court judges weren't buying in spite of Dumas' animated exhibitions of evidence-less conjecture. Mr. Dumas, whose known for entertaining and unfounded outbursts, could not convince any judge that my litigation, "Was the most overblown case I have ever seen in all my years of practicing law." Aniko's own testimony was all the evidence needed to prove my allegations. During the course of the execution of this and other litigations, the woman has rarely opened her mouth to say the same thing twice.

In my response letter to Mr. Tyson, I made it clear that not only was this website truthful, accurate and completely defensible, but that it was critical to the public good. The public needs to be aware of Aniko's antics until she can be stopped and forced to pay her mounting debt to society. In the meantime Mr. Tyson, bring it on. Although I don't think Ms. Kaye can afford to pay you. You see, she owes me and my fellow litigants another $1.1 million.